DOMINA v. PRATT, 111 Vt. 178 (1940)
13 A.2d 204
Supreme Court of Vermont.February Term, 1940.
Opinion filed May 7, 1940.
ACTION OF TORT for the recovery of expenditures claimed to be necessitated by the defendant’s negligent diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff’s son, plaintiff in Arnold Domina v. the same defendant, ante, page 166, 13 A.2d. 198. Reversed andremanded.
Austin Edmunds for the defendant.
Shangraw Brown and M.H. Alexander for the plaintiff.
Present: MOULTON, C.J., SHERBURNE, BUTTLES, STURTEVANT and JEFFORDS, JJ.
MOULTON, C.J.
The plaintiff in this action is the father of the plaintiff inDomina v. Pratt, ante, p. 166, 13 A.2d. 198, and seeks to recover from the same defendant the expenditures claimed to have been caused by the latter’s negligent diagnosis and treatment of the child. The verdict below was for the plaintiff, and the cause is here on the defendant’s exceptions, which raise the same questions which we have passed upon in the former opinion. That decision is controlling here, for the reasons therein given.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.