STATE v. LaFOUNTAIN, 146 Vt. 649 (1985)
499 A.2d 796
No. 84-408Supreme Court of Vermont.
August 2, 1985.
Appeal from District Court, Unit No. 2, Chittenden Circuit.
Defendant has squarely raised a question of first impression: Is a “jailhouse interrogation” presumptively custodial under the provisions of the Vermont Constitution, ch. I, art. 10, thereby requiring prophylactic “Miranda warnings” by police officials?
Neither party, however, has presented any substantive analysis or argument on this question. This constitutes inadequate briefing, and we decline to address the state constitutional question presented in this case. State v.Taylor, 145 Vt. 437, 439, 491 A.2d 1034, 1035 (1985). Moreover, even if the issue had been properly briefed, there is no apparent merit to the appeal. Defendant went to the police station voluntarily to inquire about his motorcycle. The statements he made while there were admitted at trial without objection, and the issue we are asked to rule on was not raised below. Defendant was never in custody during the period in question.
Appeal dismissed.
2018 VT 12 Lesley Adams, William Adams and Adams Construction VT, LLC v. Russell D. Barr…
2018 VT 11 In re Gregory J. Bombardier No. 2017-014 Supreme Court of Vermont September Term,…
2018 VT 5 In re Edwin A. Towne, Jr. No. 2013-191 No. 2015-382 Supreme Court of…
2018 VT 6 State of Vermont v. Jeffrey Kittredge SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2017-442 Supreme Court…
2018 VT 4 In re L.H., L.H. and L.H., Juveniles No. 2017-240 Supreme Court of Vermont…
2018 VT 3 In re Petition of Stowe Cady Hill Solar, LLC No. 2017-189 Supreme Court…